To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

1971 in paleontology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

List of years in paleontology (table)
In science
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
+...

Paleontology or palaeontology is the study of prehistoric life forms on Earth through the examination of plant and animal fossils.[1] This includes the study of body fossils, tracks (ichnites), burrows, cast-off parts, fossilised feces (coprolites), palynomorphs and chemical residues. Because humans have encountered fossils for millennia, paleontology has a long history both before and after becoming formalized as a science. This article records significant discoveries and events related to paleontology that occurred or were published in the year 1971.

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/5
    Views:
    1 055 878
    910
    32 087
    193 805
    416
  • Evolution: It's a Thing - Crash Course Biology #20
  • Born in a Trunk (Steve Allen)
  • Scarlet feature - Ashfall Fossil Beds
  • Geologic "Eras", animated
  • Bring the KU T. rex home

Transcription

Congratulations! This is our last episode of our section on Evolution and Genetics, which puts us at the halfway mark of CrashCourse Biology. So far we've learned about DNA, genetics, natural selection, how cells multiply, populations, speciation, replication, respiration, and photosynthesitation. I'm so proud of you. But I couldn't let this section end without discussing the iscussion that everybody can't help but discuss these days: Evolution. It's a thing. It's not a debate. Evolution is what makes life possible. It allows organisms to adapt to the environment as it changes. It's responsible for the enormous diversity and complexity of life on Earth, which not only provides organisms with sources of food and some healthy competition. It also gives us some truly awesome stuff to marvel at. And even though evolution makes living things different from one another, it also shows us how we're all the same. All of life, every single thing that's alive on the Earth today, can claim the same shared heritage, having descended from the very first microorganism when life originated on this planet 3.8 billion years ago. There are people who will say that this is all random- It's not. And that this clumsy process could not be possible for the majestic beauty of our world. To them, I say, well at least we agree that our world is beautiful but, well you're probably not going to enjoy the rest of this video. To me, there are two sorts of people in the world, those who are excited about the power and beauty and simplicity of the process of evolution, and those who don't understand it. And somehow, I live in a country where only 40% of the population believes that evolution is a thing. The only possible reason for that that I can accept is that they just don't understand it. It's time to get real, people. First, let's understand what we mean when we talk about the theory of evolution. Evolution is just the idea that gene distribution changes over time, which is an indisputable fact which we observe all the time in the natural world. But the THEORY of evolution is a large set of ideas that integrates and explains a huge mass of observations from different disciplines including embryology, paleontology, botany, biochemistry, anatomy and geophysics. In every day language, the word "theory" means "hunch" or even "hypothesis." But in science, a theory is an idea that explains several phenomena at once. Thus, The theory of evolution is a bunch of ideas that explain many things that we, as humans, have observed for thousands of years. It's the theory that meticulously and precisely explains the facts, and the facts are indisputable. So let's spend some time going through the facts, and how evolution explains them all so well. First, fossils: The fossil record shows that organisms that lived long ago were different from those that we see today. Sounds obvious, but two hundred years ago it seemed a little bit crazy. When scientists first started studying dinosaur fossils in the 1820s, they thought that all dinosaurs were basically giant iguanas. That's why the first fossil dinosaur was named Iguanodon. It wasn't until the fossils of two-legged dinosaurs started showing up in the 1850s that scientists had to grapple with the idea that organisms of the past were somewhat similar to ones today like, dinosaurs were reptiles, but many of them took on a diversity that's barely recognizable to us. And of all those ancient not-really-iguanas were all extinct, either dying out completely or evolving into organisms that survive today, like birds. Fossils make it clear that only evolution can explain the origin of these new kinds of organisms. For instance, fossils taught us that whales used to walk. Whales are cetaceans, a group of mammals that includes porpoises and dolphins, and biologists long suspected that whales descended from land mammals. Partly because some modern whales still have the vestigial remnants of a pelvis and hind-limb bones. But it wasn't until recently, the 1990s and 2000s, that the pieces really came together. First, paleontologists discovered fossils of DOR-oo-dons, cetaceans that had different skulls from modern whales but still had the same vestigial leg bones. Then they found even older fossil remains of another cetacean that actually had hind legs and a pelvis. The pelvis wasn't fused to the backbone like ours is, so it did swim like a whale, but more importantly, it still had ankle bones And they were ankle bones that are unique to the order that includes bison, pigs, hippos and deer. So by following these clues left behind in fossilized bones, paleontologists were able to track the origin of whales back to the same origin as bison and pigs. This leads us to another series of facts that evolution explains: Not how animals were different, but how they are incredibly similar. Last week we talked about Carl Linnaeus and how he classified organisms by their structural similarities. Well he didn't know anything about evolution or genetics, but when he began grouping things in this way, he hit upon one of evolution's most prominent clues: homologous structures. The fact that so many organisms share so many finely detailed structures shows us that we're related. Let's go back to the whale. Like my dog, Lemon, and me, the whale has two limbs at the front of its body, its front flippers. And so does this bat, its wings. Inside our limbs we all have the very same structure: one longish bone on top, connected to two thin bones at the joint, followed by a cluster of small bones called the carpals, and then our fingers, or digits. We each use our forelimbs for totally different purposes: the bat flies, the whale swims, Lemon walks and I... you know, jazz hands! Building limbs like this isn't the most efficient way to swim or fly or walk. Our limbs have the same structure because we descended from the same animal, something like this more-gan-uh-cah-don here, which, yeah, has the same forelimb structure. In the first stage of our existence, every vertebrate looks almost exactly the same. Why? Because we're all descended from the same initial vertebrates. So our structures are the same as other mammals and other vertebrates, sure, but it also turns out that our molecules are the same as, like, everything. In fact, if we were ever to find life on Mars or something, the sure fire way of knowing whether it's really extra-terrestrial is to check and see if it has RNA in it. All living things on our planet use DNA and/or RNA to encode the information that makes them what they are. The fact that we all use the same molecule itself suggests that we are all related, even if very distantly. But what's more, by sequencing the DNA of any given creature, we can see precisely how alike we are. The more closely related species are, the more of the same DNA sequences they have. So the human genome is 98.6% identical to that of the chimpanzee, our closest evolutionary relative, and fellow primate. But it's also 85% the same as a mouse. And I wonder how you're going to feel about this, about half of our genes are the same as in fruit flies, which are animals, at least. So, just as your DNA proves that you descended from your parents, your DNA also shows that you descended from other organisms and ultimately, from that one prokaryotic microorganism 3.8 billion years ago that is the grandparent of us all. Now when it comes to species that are very similar, like say, marsupials, their distribution around the world or their biogeography, is also explained extraordinarily well by the theory of evolution. Animals that are the most similar, and are the most closely related, tend to be found in the same regions, because evolutionary change is driven in part by geographical change. As we talked about in our speciation episode, when organisms become isolated by physical barriers, like oceans or mountains, they take their own evolutionary courses. But in the time scales we're talking about, the geographical barriers are much older, and are often even the result of continental drift. So, marsupials. You know about marsupials. They can be found in many places, but they aren't evenly distributed around the world. By far the highest concentration of them is in Australia. Even the majority of mammal fossils in Australia are marsupials. So why is Australia rife with kangaroos, koalas and wombats while North America just has, opossums? Fossils show us that one of marsupials' earliest ancestors found its way to Australia before continental drift turned it into an island 30 million years ago. More importantly, after Australia broke away, placental mammals like us evolved on the main landmass and quickly outcompeted most of the marsupials left behind, in what would become North and South America. So, very few marsupials remain in the Americas, while Australia has been drifting around like some kind of marsupial Love Boat. Darwin's finches are another example of biogeographical evidence As he wrote in The Origin of Species, Darwin observed that different species of finches on separate Galapagos islands were not only similar to each other but were also similar to a species on the South American mainland. He hypothesized that the island finches were all descendants of the mainland finch and changed over time to be more fit for their environments, a hypothesis that genetic testing has since confirmed. Now, you'll remember, I hope, a few weeks ago, when I told you about Peter and Rosemary Grant, the evolutionary biologists/lovebirds who have studied Galapagos finches since the 1970s. One of their greatest contributions came in 2009 when studying finches on the island of Daphne Major. They discovered that the offspring of an immigrant finch from another island and a Daphne Major finch had become a new species in less than 30 years. This is just the latest example of our fourth body of evolutionary evidence: direct observation of evolution. The fact is, we have seen evolution take place in our own lifetimes. One of the fastest and most common changes we observe is the growing resistance to drugs and other chemicals. In 1959, a study of mosquitos in a village in India found that DDT killed 95% of the mosquitos on the first application. Those that survived reproduced and passed on their genetic resistance to the insecticide. Within a year, DDT was killing only 49% of the mosquitos, and it continued to drop. The genetic makeup of the mosquito population changed because of the selective pressures caused by the use of DDT. But it's not just tiny changes in tiny animals, we've also observed larger animals undergoing some pretty striking changes. In 1971, for instance, biologists transplanted ten Italian wall lizards from one island off the coast of Croatia to another. Thirty years later, the immigrant lizards' descendants had undergone some amazing, fundamental changes like, even though the original lizards were mainly insect eaters, their digestive systems had changed to help them exploit the island's most abundant food source: plants. They actually developed muscles between their large and small intestine that effectively created fermenting chambers, which allowed them to digest vegetation. Plus, their heads became wider and longer to allow them to better bite and chew the grasses and leaves. These are all great examples of microevolution, allele frequency changes that happens rather quickly and in small populations. Macroevolution is just that microevolution on a much longer time scale. The sort of thing that turns hippos into whales is a lot harder to observe for a species that, 200 years ago, thought dinosaurs were big iguanas, but part of the power of the human mind is being able to see far beyond itself and the time scales that our own individual lives are limited to. And I for one, am pretty proud of that. Let's all at least agree that the world is a beautiful and wonderful place. And life is worth studying and knowing more about, and that's what Biology is. If you want to go back and watch parts of this video again please click on the annotations in the little table of contents over there. If you have questions for us, please leave them on Facebook or Twitter or in the YouTube comments below. Thanks to everybody who helped put this together. And we'll see you next time.

Arthropods

Crustaceans

Name Novelty Status Authors Age Type locality Location Notes Images

Oplophorus roselli[2]

Sp nov

jr synonym

Via

Barremian

Las Hoyas

 Spain

Moved to the genus Delclosia

Pseudastacus llopisi[2]

Sp nov

jr synonym

Via

Barremian

Las Hoyas

 Spain

A crayfish, moved to the genus Austropotamobius in 1997.[3]

Plants

Angiosperms

Name Novelty Status Authors Age Type locality Location Notes Images

Holmskioldia quilchenensis[4]

Sp nov

jr synonym

Mathewes & Brooke

Ypresian

Coldwater Beds

 Canada
 British Columbia

A mallow relative.
moved to Florissantia quilchenensis (1992)

Florissantia quilchenensis

Conodonts

Name Novelty Status Authors Age Type locality Country/subdivision Notes Image

Baltoniodus[5]

gen nov

valid

Maurits Lindström

 Sweden

Paracordylodus[5]

gen nov

valid

Maurits Lindström

 Sweden

Microzarkodina[5]

gen nov

valid

Maurits Lindström

 Sweden

Archosauromorphs

Newly named pseudosuchians

Name Novelty Status Authors Age Type locality Country/subdivision Notes Image

Venaticosuchus[6]

gen et sp nov

valid

Bonaparte

Late Triassic

 Argentina

an ornithosuchid

Venaticosuchus rusconii

Newly named dinosaurs

Data courtesy of George Olshevsky's dinosaur genera list.[7]

Name Novelty Status Authors Age Type locality Country/subdivision Notes Image

Nemegtosaurus[8]

gen et sp nov

Valid

Nowinski

Late Cretaceous

Nemegt Basin

 Mongolia

Yaverlandia[9]

gen et sp nov

Valid

Galton

Lower Cretaceous

Wessex Formation

 England

Maniraptoran?

Newly named onithodirans

Name Novelty Status Authors Age Type locality Country/subdivision Notes Image

Lagerpeton[10]

gen et sp nov

Valid

Romer

Ladinian

Chañares Formation

 Argentina

A member of the lagerpetonidae.

Lagerpeton

Lagosuchus[10]

fam et gen et sp nov

valid

Romer

Ladinian

Chañares Formation

 Argentina

Newly named birds

Name Novelty Status Authors Age Type locality Country/subdivision Notes Image

Anser devjatkini[11]

Sp. nov.

Valid

Kurochkin

Late Miocene

Hyargas Nuur Formation

 Mongolia

An Anatidae.

Antillovultur[12]

Gen. et sp. nov.

jr synonym

Arredondo

Late Quaternary

Las Breas de San Felipe

 Cuba

An accipitrid,
Type species A. varonai,
moved to Gymnogyps varonai (2003),[13]

Bathornis minor[14]

Sp. nov.

Valid

Cracraft

Early Miocene

 USA
 South Dakota

A bathornithid

Bucorvus brailloni[15]

Sp. nov.

Valid

Brunet

Middle Miocene

 Morocco

A bucorvid.

Campephilus dalquesti[16]

Sp. nov.

Valid

Brodkorb

Late Pliocene (Blancan)

 USA
 Texas

A picid.

Cerorhinca minor[17]

Sp. nov.

Valid

Howard

Late Miocene - Late Pliocene

Almejas Formation

 Mexico

An alcid.

Cygnus pristinus[11]

Sp. nov.

Valid

Kurochkin

Late Miocene - Early Pliocene

Chirgiz-Nur Formation

 Mongolia

An anatid.

Dolichonyx kruegeri[18]

Sp. nov.

Valid

Fischer & Stephan

Late Pleistocene

"Cave deposits"

 Cuba

An icterid.

Eutreptornis[14]

Gen. et sp. nov.

Valid

Cracraft

Middle Eocene

Uinta Formation

 USA
 Utah

A bathornithid. Type species E. uintae

Fulica picapicensis[18]

Sp. nov.

jr synonym

Fischer & Stephan

Quaternary

"Cave deposits"

 Cuba

A flightless rallid,
moved to Nesotrochis picapicensis (1974).

Grus cubensis[19]

Sp. nov.

Valid

Fischer & Stephan

Late Pleistocene

"Cave deposits"

 Cuba

A crane.
Moved to Antigone cubensis (2020).[20]

Antigone cubensis (top)

Macrorhamphus finitimus[11]

Sp. nov.

Valid

Kurochkin

Pliocene

 Mongolia

A scolopacid,
Moved to Limnodromus finitimus.

Mancalla cedrosensis[17]

Sp. nov.

Valid

Howard

Early Pliocene

Almejas Formation

 Mexico

A mancaline alcid

Onychopteryx[21]

Gen. et sp. nov.

Valid

Cracraft

Early Eocene

Casamajor Formation

 Argentina

An onychopterygid
Type species O. simpsoni

Phalacrocorax mongoliensis[11]

Sp. nov.

Valid

Kurochkin

Late Miocene - Pliocene

 Mongolia

A phalacrocoracid.

?Platydyptes marplesi[22]

Sp. nov.

Valid

Simpson

Early or Middle Oligocene (Duntroonian)

 New Zealand

A spheniscid.

Progrus[23]

Gen. et sp. nov.

Valid

Bendukidze

Middle - Late Eocene

Kalmakpai River

 Kazakhstan

An eogruid.
Type species P. turanicus
Moved to Eogrus turanicus.

Proplegadis[24]

Gen. et sp. nov.

Valid

Harrison & Walker

Early Eocene

 UK
 England

A possible phaethontid,
Type species P. fisheri

Puffinus tedfordi[17]

Sp. nov.

Valid

Howard

Early Pliocene

Almejas Formation

 Mexico

A procellariid.

Spheniscus predemersus[25]

Sp. nov.

jr synonym

Simpson

Late Pliocene

Langebaanweg fossil site

 South Africa

A spheniscid,
Moved to Inguza predemersus (1975)[26]

Spizaetus tanneri[27]

Sp. nov.

Valid

Martin

Early Pleistocene

Broadwater Formation

 USA
 Nebraska

An accipitrid.

Struthio transcaucasicus[28]

Sp. nov.

Valid

Burchak-Abramovich & Vekua

Late Pliocene (Akchagil age)

 Georgia

A struthionid.

Wimanornis[29]

Gen. et sp. nov.

Valid

Simpson

Eocene

Seymour Island

 Antarctica

A basal spheniscid
Type species W. seymourensis

Newly named pterosaurs

Name Novelty Status Authors Age Type locality Country/subdivision Notes Image

Araripesaurus

gen et sp nov

Valid

Price

Early Cretaceous

Santana Formation

 Brazil

an ornithocheirid

Araripesaurus.

Sordes

gen et sp nov

Valid

Sharov

Late Jurassic

Karabastau Svita

 Kazakhstan

possible rhamphorhynchid

Sordes pilosus

Other Animals

Name Status Authors Age Unit Location Notes Images
Chondroplon Valid Wade Ediacaran  Australia  Russia Sometimes considered a synonym of Dickinsonia

References

  1. ^ Gini-Newman, Garfield; Graham, Elizabeth (2001). Echoes from the past: world history to the 16th century. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson Ltd. ISBN 9780070887398. OCLC 46769716.
  2. ^ a b Via, Luis (1971). "Crustáceos decápodos del Jurásico Superior de Montsech (Lérida)". Cuadernas Geología Ibérica. 2: 607–612.
  3. ^ Garassino, Alessandro (1997). "The macruran decapod crustaceans of the Lower Cretaceous (Lower Barremian) of Las Hoyas (Cuenca, Spain)". Atti della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali e del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale in Milano. 137 (1–2): 101–126.
  4. ^ Manchester, S.R. (1992). "Flowers, fruits and pollen of Florissantia, an extinct malvalean genus from the Eocene and Oligocene of western North America". American Journal of Botany. 79 (9): 996–1008. doi:10.2307/2444909. JSTOR 2444909.
  5. ^ a b c Lindström Maurits (1971). "Vom Anfang, Hochstand und Ende eines Epikontinentalmeeres". Geologische Rundschau. 60 (2): 419–438. Bibcode:1971GeoRu..60..419L. doi:10.1007/BF02000464. S2CID 128476116.
  6. ^ Bonaparte, J.F. 1970. Annotated list of the South American Triassic tetrapods. Second Gondwana Symposium South Africa, Proceedings and Papers: pp. 665-682.
  7. ^ Olshevsky, George. "Dinogeorge's Dinosaur Genera List". Archived from the original on 2011-07-15. Retrieved 2008-08-07.
  8. ^ Nowinski, A. 1971. Nemegtosaurus mongoliensis n. gen., n. sp (Sauropoda) from the uppermost Cretaceous of Mongolia. Palaeontol. Polonica 25: pp. 57-81.
  9. ^ Galton, P.M. 1971. A primitive dome-headed dinosaur (Ornithischia: Pachycephalosauridae) from the Lower Cretaceous of England, and the function of the dome in pachycephalosaurids. J. Paleontol. 45: pp. 40-47.
  10. ^ a b Romer, A.S. 1971. The Chañares (Argentina) Triassic reptile fauna. X. Two new but incompletely known long-limbed pseudosuchians. Breviora 378: pp. 1-10.
  11. ^ a b c d Evgeny N. Kurochkin (1971). "[On the Pliocene Avifauna of Mongolia]". Transactions of the Joint Soviet-Mongolian Geological Expedition. 3 (5): 58–69.
  12. ^ Oscar Arredondo (1971). "Nuevo Género y Especie de Ave Fósil (Accipitriformes: Vulturidae) del Pleistoceno de Cuba". Memoria de la Sociedad de Ciencias Naturales la Salle. 31 (90): 309–323.
  13. ^ Suárez, W.; Emslie, S.D. (2003). "New fossil material with a redescription of the extinct condor Gymnogyps varonai (Arredondo, 1971) from the Quaternary of Cuba (Aves: Vulturidae)" (PDF). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington. 116 (1): 29–37.
  14. ^ a b Joel Cracraft (1971). "Systematics and Evolution of the Gruiformes (Class, Aves) 2. Additional Comments on the Bathornithidae, with Descriptions of a New Species" (PDF). American Museum Novitates (2449): 1–14.
  15. ^ J. Brunet (1971). "Oiseaux Miocénes de Beni Mellal (Maroc), un Complément à Leur Étude". Notes et Mémoires, Service Géologique (Morocco). 31: 109–111.
  16. ^ Pierce Brodkorb (1971). "The Paleospecies of Woodpeckers" (PDF). Quarterly Journal of the Florida Academy of Sciences. 33: 132–136. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-10-30. Retrieved 2014-10-29.
  17. ^ a b c Hildegarde Howard (1971). "Pliocene Avian Remains from Baja California" (PDF). Museum of Natural History of Los Angeles County, Contributions in Science. 217: 1–17. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-10-28. Retrieved 2014-10-28.
  18. ^ a b Karlheinz Fischer; Burkhard Stephan (1971). "Weitere Vogelreste aus dem Pleistozän der Pio-Domingo-Höhle in Kuba". Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Reihe. 20: 593–607.
  19. ^ Karlheinz Fischer; Burkhard Stephan (1971). "Ein Flugunfahiger Kranich (Grus cubensis n.sp.) aus dem Pleitozän von Kuba - eine Osteologie der Familie der Kraniche (Gruidae)". Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Reihe. 20: 541–592.
  20. ^ William Suárez (2020). "The fossil avifauna of the tar seeps Las Breas de San Felipe, Matanzas, Cuba". Zootaxa. 4780 (1): zootaxa.4780.1.1. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.4780.1.1. PMID 33055754. S2CID 219510089.
  21. ^ Joel Cracraft (1971). "A New Family of Hoatzin-like Birds (Order Opisthocomiformes) from the Eocene of South America" (PDF). Ibis. 113 (2): 229–233. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919x.1971.tb05148.x.
  22. ^ George G. Simpson (1971). "A Review of the Pre-Pliocene Penguins of New Zealand" (PDF). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. 144 (5): 319–378.
  23. ^ Oleg G. Bendukidze (1971). "Novyj prestavitel' semeistva Geranoididae (Aves, Gruiformes) iz eotsenovykh otlozhenij Zaisan". Soobtzhenija Akademii Nauk Gruzinskoj SSSR. 63: 749–751.
  24. ^ Colin J. O. Harrison & Cyril A. Walker (1971). "A New Ibis from the lower Eocene of Britain". Ibis. 113 (3): 367–368. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919x.1971.tb05169.x.
  25. ^ George G. Simpson (1971). "Fossil Penguin from the Late Cenozoic of South Africa". Science. 171 (3976): 1144–1145. Bibcode:1971Sci...171.1144G. doi:10.1126/science.171.3976.1144. PMID 17777603. S2CID 35775139.
  26. ^ George G. Simpson (1975). "Notes on Variation in Penguins and on Fossil Penguins from the Pliocene of Langebaanweg, Cape Province, South Africa". Annals of the South African Museum. 69 (4): 59–72.
  27. ^ Larry D. Martin (1971). "An Early Pleistocene Eagle from Nebraska" (PDF). Condor. 73 (2): 248–250. doi:10.2307/1365848. JSTOR 1365848.
  28. ^ Nikolay I. Burchak-Abramovich & Abesalom K. Vekua (1971). "The Fossil Ostrich from the Akchagil Layers of Georgia". Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia. 16 (1): 1–28.
  29. ^ George G. Simpson (1971). "Review of the fossil penguins from Seymour Island". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. 178 (1053): 357–387. Bibcode:1971RSPSB.178..357S. doi:10.1098/rspb.1971.0070. S2CID 84900109.
This page was last edited on 24 November 2023, at 21:20
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.