To install click the Add extension button. That's it.

The source code for the WIKI 2 extension is being checked by specialists of the Mozilla Foundation, Google, and Apple. You could also do it yourself at any point in time.

4,5
Kelly Slayton
Congratulations on this excellent venture… what a great idea!
Alexander Grigorievskiy
I use WIKI 2 every day and almost forgot how the original Wikipedia looks like.
Live Statistics
English Articles
Improved in 24 Hours
Added in 24 Hours
What we do. Every page goes through several hundred of perfecting techniques; in live mode. Quite the same Wikipedia. Just better.
.
Leo
Newton
Brights
Milds

2008 Civic Democratic Party leadership election

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2008 Civic Democratic Party leadership election

← 2006 7 December 2008 2010 →
Turnout89.8%
 
Candidate Mirek Topolánek Pavel Bém
Electoral vote 284 162
Percentage 63.7% 36.3%

Leader of ODS before election

Mirek Topolánek

Elected Leader of ODS

Mirek Topolánek

The Civic Democratic Party (ODS) leadership election of 2008 was a part of party's congress. It happened after ODS lost Senate election and regional elections. Incumbent leader and Prime Minister Mirek Topolánek faced Mayor of Prague Pavel Bém who was supported by President Václav Klaus.[1]

Topolánek was re-elected when he received votes from 284 delegates while Bém received only 162 votes. 492 delegates could participate in election. Topolánek promised to learn from his mistakes and said that he will unite the party.[2] Bém congratulated Topolánek but later saif that even though he respects him, he doesn't think that ODS will win next election if Topolánek is the leader of ODS.[3]

YouTube Encyclopedic

  • 1/5
    Views:
    868 878
    3 595 510
    2 298
    788 174
    5 840
  • Congressional Leadership: Crash Course Government and Politics #8
  • The New Deal: Crash Course US History #34
  • 2021 - 100 Civics Questions (2008 VERSION) for the U.S. Citizenship interview Test
  • Election Basics: Crash Course Government and Politics #36
  • Focus on the U.S. election: a two-part web series – part one

Transcription

Hi, I'm Craig and this is Crash Course Government and Politics, and today we're going to examine the leadership structure of Congress! I know, pretty exciting stuff! Now calm down, let me explain. Are you ready to talk about Congressional leadership? You better be. So, the Congressional leadership are the Congresspersons with titles like Majority Leader and Minority Whip, and they have a lot to do with political parties, so we're going to talk about what the political parties do in Congress as well. Even if you don't follow politics, you probably have heard of the name and titles, if not the functions, of the various leaders. I'm going to need some help on this one, so... Let's go the Clone Zone! In the Clone Zone today I've got House Clone and Senate Clone to help me explain Congressional leadership. House Clone in the house! Take it away. The leader of the House of Representatives is the Speaker of the House, and he or she is the third most powerful person in the country. The speaker is always elected by whichever party is in the majority. These elections take place every two years, because the whole House is elected every two years. That's a lot of elections! At the time of the shooting of the episode the Speaker of the House is John Boehner from Ohio, known for his tan, tears, and tacos. Yeaah, he's oddly really good at making tacos. I had the barbecue pork at his house one time.... Yeah, I had the beef taco! He called it la lengua. Interesting choice. Yeah. The speaker has two assistants to help run the house. The Majority Whip has the primary task of counting votes on important pieces of legislation, and making the party members vote along with their party. Whipping them into line, I suppose. (whipping noise) The third in line is the House Majority Leader, who helps the majority and probably does other stuff, but mainly he's chosen by the speaker because he's popular with particular factions within the party. The Minority Party, that's the one with fewer members elected in a term, duh (scoffs), also has a Minority Leader, and a Minority Whip, but no speaker. The Minority Leader is the de facto spokesperson for the minority party in the House, which is why you often see him or her on TV, or on your phone, or, your iPad, or your pager. I don't think you can see it on your pager. Hey, that was some pretty good stuff you said there House Clone. What's the deal with the Senate, Senate Clone? Things are simpler over in the Senate because we have only 100 august members and not the rabble of 435 to try to "manage." The leader of the Senate is the Majority Leader and he (so far it's always been a he) is elected by the members of his party, which by definition is the majority party, the one with 51 or more members. There's also a Minority Leader, which, like the Minority Leader in the House, is the party's spokesperson. The Vice President presides over the Senate sessions when he doesn't have anything better to do, even though it's one of his few official constitutional duties. When the veep is off at a funeral, or undermining the president with one of his gaffes, the President pro tempore presides. The President pro tem is a largely ceremonial role that is given to the most senior member of the majority party. Senior here means longest serving, not necessarily oldest, although it can be the same thing. No one would want to be a Congressional leader if there was no power involved, so it's important to know what powers these folks have, and how they exercise them. Also, I'm not supposed to do this, but let's go to the Thought Bubble. I love saying that! The primary way that leaders in both the House and Senate exercise power is through committee assignments. By assigning certain members to certain committees, the leadership can ensure that their views will be represented on those committees. Also, leaders can reward members with good committee assignments, usually ones that allow members to connect with their constituents, or stay in the public eye, or punish wayward members with bad committee assignments. Like the committee for cleaning the toilets or something. The Speaker of the House is especially powerful in his role assigning Congressmen to committees. Congressional leaders shape the agenda of Congress, having a huge say in which issues get discussed and how that discussion takes place. The Speaker is very influential here, although how debate happens in the House is actually decided by the House Rules Committee, which makes this a rather powerful committee to be on. The Senate doesn't have a rules committee, so there's no rules! Aw, yeah! There's rules. The body as a whole decides how long debate will go on, and whether amendments will be allowed, but the Majority Leader, if he can control his party, still has a lot of say in what issues will get discussed. Agenda setting is often a negative power, which means that it is exercised by keeping items off the agenda rather than putting them on. It's much easier to keep something from being debated at all than to manage the debate once it's started, and it's also rather difficult for the media to discuss an issue that's never brought up, no matter how much the public might ask, "But why don't you talk about this thing that matters a lot to me?" Thanks, Thought Bubble. Speaking of the media, Congressional leaders can also wield power because they have greater access to the press and especially TV. That's the thing people used to watch. Instead of YouTube. This is largely a matter of efficiency. Media outlets have only so many reporters, and they aren't going to waste resources on the first-term Congressman from some district in upstate New York. No one even goes to upstate New York. Is there anyone in upstate New York? Has anyone ever gone to upstate New York? When the Speaker calls a press conference reporters show up, and the Majority Leader can usually get on the Sunday talk shows if he wants. Media access is a pretty handy way to set an agenda for the public. Finally, Congressional leaders exercise a lot of power through their ability to raise money and to funnel it into their colleague's campaign. I want colleagues like that. Each House of Congress has a special campaign committee and whoever chairs it has the ability to shift campaign funds to the race that needs it most, or to the Congressperson he or she most wants to influence. The official leadership has little trouble raising money since donors want to give to proven winners who have a lot of power, and get the most bang for their buck. Since the leaders usually win their races easily, this is more true in the House than the Senate. They frequently have extra campaign money to give. Often the donations are given to political action committees, or PACs, which we'll talk about in another episode. We're going to spend a lot of time talking about political parties, and probably having parties of our own in later episodes, especially their role in elections, but they are really important once Congress is in office too. One way that parties matter is incredibly obvious if you stop to think about it. It's contained in the phrase "majority rules." This is especially true in the House, where the majority party chooses the Speaker, but it's also the case in the Senate. This is why ultimately political parties organize and raise so much money to win elections: if one of the parties controls both houses and the presidency, as the Democrats did in 2008 through 2009, that party is much more likely to actually get things done. The party that's the majority in each house is also the majority on all of that house's committees, or at least the important ones, and, as we saw in the last episode, committees are where most of the legislative work in Congress gets done. Gets did. As you probably figured out, the majority party chooses the committee chairs, too, so it's really got a lock on that sweet legislative agenda. Parties also can make Congress more efficient by providing a framework for cooperation. The party provides a common set of values, so a Republican from Florida and one from Wyoming will have something in common, even if their constituents don't. These common values can be the basis of legislation sometimes. But sometimes that happens. Political parties also provide discipline in the process. When a party is more unified it's easier for the leader to set an agenda and get the membership to stick to it. Right? Unified. Lack of party unity can make it difficult for the leadership. In 2011 a large group of very conservative newbie Congressmen associated with the Tea Party Movement made it difficult for Speaker Boehner to put forward an agenda. The Tea Party caucus felt Boehner compromised too much with the Democrats, even though his agenda was, by some standards, pretty conservative. As a result, Congress wasn't able to get much done, except make itself unpopular. So, if you combine all this with the stuff we learned about Congressional committees, you should have a pretty good understanding of how Congress actually works. Yay! Understanding! As this course progresses and you fall in love with politics, and myself, be on the lookout for how the leadership sets the agenda and pay attention to what issues might be floating around that aren't getting discussed in Congress. Understanding who the Congressional leaders are, and knowing their motivations, can give you a sense of why things do and don't get done by the government. And, if you're lucky, you live in a district represented by a member of leadership. In that case, the person you vote for will be in the news all the time, which is kind of satisfying, I guess. Yeah, I voted for that guy! Yeah! And now he's on the TV! Yeah! Thanks for watching. We'll see you next week. What do you think, can we be unified? Can we get things done? We can't. Crash Course Government and Politics is produced in association with PBS Digital Studios. Support for Crash Course US Government comes from Voqal. Voqal supports non-profits that use technology and media to advance social equity. Learn more about their mission and initiatives at voqal.org. Crash Course was made by all of these nice people. Thanks for watching. Someday, maybe the eagle and I will get along. Not today. Not today.

Background

Mirek Topolánek became leader of ODS in 2002. He was reelected in 2004 and 2006. ODS won under his leadership 2006 legislative election but in 2008, ODS suffered heavy defeat in regional and senate elections. Topolánek was blamed for the defeat and was speculated to be replaced in incoming leadership election. Pavel Bém was speculated to be his rival.[4][5][6] Topolánek stated on 19 October 2008 that he plans to run for reelection.[7]

Pavel Bém announced his candidacy on 27 October 2008. He was supported by President of the Czech Republic and founder of ODS Václav Klaus. He stated that his candidacy is a reaction party's defeat in 2008 elections. Bém was endorsed by party's regional governors. It was believed that Topolánek will be defeated by Bém.[8][9] There were other politicians who expressed interest in the election Oldřich Vojíř stated that he plans to run for the position. Jan Zahradil would run if the election is deadblocked. Petr Bendl also considered running. Evžen Tošenovský and Miroslava Němcová were speculated to run. Němcová herself dismissed speculations that she plans to run against Topolánek while Tošenovský stated that he doesn't know whether he will run for the position.[10][11]

Topolánek officially announced his candidacy on 2 November 2008.[12][13] Topolánek was endorsed by some influential politicians within the party such as Ivan Langer, Jiří Pospíšil and Tomáš Julínek.[14][15] Topolánek was supported by large portion of party's members. His supporters included some celebrities such as director Filip Renč or actress Daniela Šinkorová. Topolánek started to gather new allies.[11] Topolánek quickly gathered nominations from multiple party's organisations. On 25 November 2008, Toolánek received nomination from Prague organisation that was considered Bém's stronghold.[16] Bém's victory was considered unlikely.[17]

Václav Klaus gave up his title as Honorary Chairman of the party before the election took place. Klaus stated that he has problem to identify with party's politics for very long time.[18] He thanked the party for help during presidential elections. He stated that he realises that he would never be a president if there was no ODS and thanked for previous 18 years that he lived together with ODS. Klaus' decision led to many emotional reactions among members of the party.[19]

Opinion polls

Agency Date Sample Mirek Topolánek Pavel Bém Evžen Tošenovský Miroslava Němcová Jan Zahradil Petr Gandalovič Petr Bendl Přemysl Sobotka Not Decided
iHNed.cz[20] 5 December 2008 305 Prague Citizens 30.5% 33.4% 33.1%
Median[21] 1 December 2008 536 6.1% 12.5% 8.0% 6.5% 4.8% 6.2% 54.9%
iDnes[22] 24 November 2008 25,940 15.67% 17.68% 48.41% 5.13% 3.82% 9.3%
Denik.cz[23] 11 November 2008 1,268 readers of Denik.cz 22% 9% 49% 5% 1% 14%

Voting

Candidate Vote %
Mirek Topolánek 284 63.7
Pavel Bém 162 36.3

Topolánek was considered front-runner. He received 284 votes against Bém's 162 and won the election.[24]

Aftermath

Topolánek remained party's leader until 2010 when he was replaced by Petr Nečas.[25]

References

  1. ^ "Bém se o své kandidatuře na předsedu ODS radil s Klausem". Novinky.cz (in Czech). Retrieved 12 August 2016.
  2. ^ "VIDEO: Topolánek zůstává šéfem ODS, "dvojkou" strany je Vodrážka". Novinky.cz (in Czech). Retrieved 12 August 2016.
  3. ^ "S Topolánkem prohrajeme příští volby, soudí poražený Pavel Bém". iDNES.cz. 7 December 2008. Retrieved 12 August 2016.
  4. ^ "Kdo může za největší volební prohru v historii ODS". iDNES.cz. 21 October 2008. Retrieved 11 August 2017.
  5. ^ "Proč prohrála ODS volby? I kvůli hádkám". TÝDEN.cz. 25 November 2008. Retrieved 11 August 2017.
  6. ^ "Bém nevyloučil kandidaturu na předsedu ODS". Novinky.cz (in Czech). Retrieved 11 August 2017.
  7. ^ "Topolánek: Budu obhajovat funkci předsedy ODS". Novinky.cz (in Czech). Retrieved 11 August 2017.
  8. ^ "Bém chce kandidovat na předsedu ODS, svůj úmysl konzultoval s Klausem". ČT24 (in Czech). Česká televize. Retrieved 11 August 2017.
  9. ^ "Bém se o své kandidatuře na předsedu ODS radil s Klausem". Novinky.cz (in Czech). Retrieved 11 August 2017.
  10. ^ "Na funkci šéfa ODS je fronta. Přibyli Vojíř a Zahradil". TÝDEN.cz. 31 October 2008. Retrieved 11 August 2017.
  11. ^ a b "Topolánek shání hlasy a láká do vlády hejtmany". iDNES.cz. 4 November 2008. Retrieved 11 August 2017.
  12. ^ "Topolánek: Budu obhajovat post šéfa ODS". TÝDEN.cz. 2 November 2008. Retrieved 11 August 2017.
  13. ^ "Topolánek oznámil, že bude obhajovat post šéfa ODS a vymění ministry". iDNES.cz. 2 November 2008. Retrieved 11 August 2017.
  14. ^ "Julínek: Topolánka na kongresu podpořím". TÝDEN.cz. 2 November 2008. Retrieved 11 August 2017.
  15. ^ "Já věřím v sílu Mirka, říká Ivan Langer". TÝDEN.cz. 2 November 2008. Retrieved 11 August 2017.
  16. ^ "Topolánka chtějí za předsedu ODS už i v Praze". iDNES.cz. 25 November 2008. Retrieved 11 August 2017.
  17. ^ "Bendl před sjezdem ODS: Bém bojuje prohranou válku". iDNES.cz. 21 November 2008. Retrieved 11 August 2017.
  18. ^ "Šéfem ODS zůstává Topolánek, Klaus odchází". Euro.cz (in Czech). 8 December 2008. Retrieved 11 August 2017.
  19. ^ "VIDEO: Klaus skončil s ODS, stranu rozladil i rozplakal". Novinky.cz (in Czech). Retrieved 11 August 2017.
  20. ^ "Blesková anketa: U Pražanů vyhrál Bém, ale těsně". iHNed.cz (in Czech). 5 December 2008. Retrieved 12 August 2016.
  21. ^ "Topolánka chce v čele ODS jen 6 procent lidí, Béma 12 procent". iDNES.cz. 1 December 2008. Retrieved 11 August 2017.
  22. ^ "ANKETA: Kdo má šanci vystřídat Topolánka v čele ODS?". iDNES.cz. 27 October 2008. Retrieved 31 July 2017.
  23. ^ "ANKETA: Kdo by měl být předsedou ODS?". Deník.cz (in Czech). 11 November 2008. Retrieved 31 July 2017.
  24. ^ "Mirek Topolánek obhájil funkci předsedy ODS". ČT24 (in Czech). Česká televize. Retrieved 11 August 2017.
  25. ^ "Mirek Topolánek končí v čele ODS. Nahradí ho Nečas". iROZHLAS (in Czech). Retrieved 11 August 2017.
This page was last edited on 24 March 2023, at 11:17
Basis of this page is in Wikipedia. Text is available under the CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License. Non-text media are available under their specified licenses. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. WIKI 2 is an independent company and has no affiliation with Wikimedia Foundation.